Monday, October 06, 2008

Myners to sort out City Fat Cats?

I found the appointment of Paul Myners to become Minister for the City and to serve as an advisor on the New Economic Council particularly interesting. Tom P saysgreat news I reckon – he knows what he’s talking about and isn’t afraid to be radical”

The Times calls the Chair of the Guardian Media Group, Land Securities, Chair of the Low Pay commission and ex-Chair of Marks and Spencer’s a “respected figure in the City”. While The Telegraph has called him “controversial which I think is nearer to the mark.

Many on the left will be most upset that he was a director of a hedge fund that made money out of the collapse of Bradford & Bingley. He also gave £12,700 to Gordon Brown’s leadership campaign.

However, there is more to him for those who want meaningful change in our financial systems that may at first appear. He is not at all easy to pigeon hole.

I first came across Paul many years ago when he was a senior fund manager with Gartmore investments. I was a relatively new trade union rep on my pension fund investment committee. The fund had decided to sack Gartmore for poor short term performance. Paul came to a meeting and gave a typically impassioned presentation to our committee about why we should not dismiss Gartmore due to its recent performance and that things will improve in the long term. The Chair of our investment committee however, had already decided Gartmore had to go...... and I went along with things. I don’t think that the replacement fund manager did that much better and has since been replaced anyway, but such is life. It did seem strange to me at the time (and since) that long term investors (pension funds) paid so much attention to short term performance.

I’ve heard Paul speak at a number of events since and he has always shown an edge as a City outsider with an appetite for controversy. Of course he is probably best well known for the Myners report on investment principals.

While I loved his appearance on BBC Question time last year where he saidThe arrogant, superior young toffs who lead the Conservative Party, neither of whom have done a serious day's work in their life... David Cameron was executive at Carlton Television which lost over a billion pounds while he was there. I take no lectures from that young man about business competence. ...Nor can we blame Gordon Brown for the sub-prime disaster in the United States of America or the recklessness of bankers.”

At the RSA early this year I heard Paul declare that he spoke “ as a trade unionist” and “someone who wouldn’t join the Labour Party because it is not sufficiently left wing for my taste” but who urged that stamp duty on shares ought to be increased to 5% in order to encourage long term ownership (not short term trading). I assume he is now a member of the Party.

He also advised the unions to concentrate their campaigning on the disparity in Executive pay “the self appointed managerial elite are raping the resources of companies”. So called “independent” external advisers on executive pay are called “Ratchet, Ratchet and Ratchet”. His distaste was clear.

Today we learnt that the former head of failed Bank Lehman Brothers, Richard Fuld, (see picture above right) “earned” $300 million in the last 8 years.

So once the present crisis is over (which eventually it will be) shall the new City Minister take steps to tackle the abuse of executive pay and short termism – and help prevent the next “Great crisis”? We’re wait and see, but I feel that if anyone can have a go .....

6 comments:

Charlie Marks said...

An interesting perspective, as ever John...

Where's that post welcoming the Lord of Darkness back into the fold?

Robert said...

Lets see what did the Front Bench do before they jumped on the gravy train shit nothing. They worked as toffs. Going through the free education scheme put in place by Labour and then removed by a Toff Tony Blair.

Do not forget what the Top man said to day, it happens every ten years, nice to know.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Boris more deregulation of the market

John Gray said...

Thanks Charlie (I think)

This does indeed deserve a post and well, to be honest, it will say if he helps the Party win in 2010 who cares? Who was it that compared him to Bill Clinton as someone who messes things up for himself but is a brilliant political tactician and advisor to others?

I’ve had a feeling latterly that the Party machine has just gone a bit wonky. Lots of little niggles, some big mistakes and some just plain wrong calls (10p tax rate, below inflation public pay etc).

I’ll much, much rather have the Prince of Darkness than "hug a huddie" and hte Eton mob.

Hi Robert
Thank you for your contribution

Hi Anon
I assume that you are being somewhat satirical of course!

Charlie Marks said...

I wasn't being funny when I said that the post has an interesting perspective. Obviously, it's significant that corrupt individuals such as Mandelson and Drayson have been brought back - the City welcomes the Lord's return. (Incidentally, are you not concerned that Mandelson is now beyond sacking - now a life peer and able to snipe from a position of power when he does resign?)

You describe the policy of public sector pay cuts and the doubling of the rate of income tax paid by the poorest workers, as being part of the party machine going wonky. I don't think Mandelson will help the party much - the CBI are happy...

John Gray said...

Hi Charlie
I’m not that sure it’s helpful to suggest that people “innocent in the eyes of the law” as being criminally corrupt. Even the prince of darkness himself! I can’t see any real issue with him being a Lord compared to an MP, there was no way he would have had been beaten in Hartlepool if he had not taken up the EU post.

It is “wonky” – now I know that this will make you choke on your cornflakes, but the vast majority of this government are decent, well meaning, conviction politicians, who are genuinely striving to progress social justice. Now this does not mean they are perfect or that there are not any rotten apples. But it would appear that no-one in government “saw it coming” over the 10p debacle or public sector pay.

Actually in one way you could understand that they only thought of the real billions that have been spent on poor pensioners, low income families and public services. You need someone like Mandy with his own somewhat “unique” talents.

Hopefully, Stalin had found his Zhukov.